Inversion of Control (IoC) is a simple, yet vastly misinterpreted concept which many get confused with Dependency Injection (DI).
Though it literally means an inversion of some control, the phrase IoC isn’t explicit enough to say what exact control that it inverts. IoC would actually mean Inversion of Ownership of Control-flow which I have explained in detail below.
Control-flow is the order in which the individual functions are executed. In a usual program control-flow is determined by the program (or functions of the program) itself where functions call each other starting from the
A program with such a design suffers from the following deficiencies which effectively make the functions not reusable in different contexts.
Violates the single responsibility principal since the functions hold the additional responsibility of deciding & invoking the subsequent function.
Tight coupling between the functions.
IoC suggests that some additional framework should own the control-flow of the program there by promoting the reusability of individual functions.
As in the above diagram, now the framework holds the responsibility of calling the functions in the required sequence and the functions are agnostic of each other.
IoC at different abstractions
IoC can be realized at different abstractions; the above example was on a procedural programming context.
- In object oriented paradigm, applications are concerned with object creation and managing the relationships between the objects as well, apart from the control-flow. As with procedural paradigm, objects knowing other concrete objects will make them less reusable and suffer from from the same deficiencies. Such applications require a special kind of framework called a container which is responsible for object creation, object life-cycle & relationships. These containers, aka Dependency Injection Frameworks, inject dependencies of the application objects thereby eliminating application objects from creating other concrete object.
- In distributed systems, the problem of distributed transactions are solved by orchestrators (i.e. sagas) which will coordinate between the processes, thereby eliminating the processes from calling each other directly.